I'm Jagruti Vala and I'm a student of English department, MKBU.
In this blog I want to share Mary Shelley's famous novel FRANKENSTEIN.
-Assigned by Megha ma'am Trivedi.
Here is a brief introduction about Mary shelley.
<<<INTRODUCTION:->>>
Born:-
Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin
30 August 1797
London, England
Died:-
1 February 1851 (aged 53)
London, England
Occupation:-
Writer, novelist
Notable works:-
"Frankenstein" (1818)
"The Last Man" (1826)
"The Fortunes of Perkin Warbeck" (1830)
Here some questions about the novel FRANKENSTEIN:-
QUESTION:-
1) What are some major differences between the movie and the novel Frankenstein?
ANSWER:-
The mejor defference between the movie and the novel FRANKENSTEIN.
Victor's youngest brother is murdered by the monster, and the blame falls on Justine, the maid, in both the novel and the movie. Yet, the way their punishments are portrayed differs between the two.
In the original novel "Frankenstein," the monster killed Henry, and Victor leading to Victor's arrest for his friend's murder. However, this crucial plot point is not depicted in the movie adaptation.
The novel 'Frankenstein' does not feature the blind man's grandchildren, while the movie adds these characters to the storyline.
In the novel, Victor willingly goes to the mountains on his adventure, but in the movie, the monster writes a letter to lure him there, altering the circumstances.
One of the most significant differences between the movie and the original novel "Frankenstein" is the final scene.
In the novel, the monster converses with Victor about creating a female monster and begins the work but ultimately destroys everything in the ocean.
In the movie, Victor creates a female monster named Elizabeth, creating a distinct departure from the source material.
QUESTION:-
2) Do you think the search for knowledge is dangerous and destructive?
ANSWER:-
In Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the pursuit of knowledge is depicted as both powerful and potentially dangerous.
The novel serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of unchecked scientific ambition and the moral and ethical responsibilities that come with the pursuit of knowledge.
So, in the context of the novel, the search for knowledge is depicted as having the potential to be dangerous and destructive when pursued without restraint or consideration for the consequences.
Shelley's portrayal of Victor serves as a cautionary tale about the responsibilities that come with knowledge and the potential harm that can result when scientific advancements are divorced from ethical considerations.
In this sense, the novel suggests that the search for knowledge can indeed be dangerous and destructive if not accompanied by a sense of responsibility and ethical awareness.
QUESTION:-
3) Who do you think is a real monster?
ANSWER:-
In Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the question of who the real monster is can be debated, and it often depends on one's perspective.
Here are key points to consider for both Victor Frankenstein and the Creature:
<<<Victor Frankenstein:>>>
1.Hubris:
Victor's excessive ambition and desire to push the boundaries of science lead him to create the Creature in the first place.
His reckless pursuit of knowledge and power can be seen as monstrous.
2.Abandonment:
After bringing the Creature to life, Victor abandons it out of fear and disgust.
He neglects his responsibilities as a creator, which contributes to the Creature's suffering and loneliness.
3.Refusal to Take Responsibility:
Victor consistently refuses to acknowledge his role in the Creature's suffering.
He does not take responsibility for the consequences of his actions, even when they lead to harm and death.
<<<The Creature:>>>
1.Isolation and Loneliness:
The Creature is rejected by society because of his appearance, leading to extreme isolation and loneliness.
His initial actions, such as seeking companionship, are driven by a desire for connection.
2.Violence and Revenge:
As the Creature experiences rejection and mistreatment, he becomes vengeful and resorts to violence.
He kills Victor's loved ones in an attempt to make him feel the same pain and loneliness.
3.Search for Identity:
The Creature's journey is marked by a search for his identity and place in the world.
He is not inherently evil but is driven to harmful actions by his experiences and the way he is treated.
4.Rejection:
The continual rejection the creature faces, both from Victor and society at large, drives much of the narrative's conflict and can be seen as a source of the monstrous actions he eventually takes.
Ultimately, the novel presents a complex exploration of the concept of monstrosity, suggesting that both Victor Frankenstein and the Creature exhibit monstrous qualities at different points in the story.
It raises questions about the consequences of unchecked ambition, the responsibilities of creators, and the role of society in shaping individuals' actions.
QUESTION:-
4) Do you think Victor Frankenstein's creature was inherently evil, or did society's rejection and mistreatment turn him into a monster?
ANSWER:-
In the beginning of the novel, the creature was not a monster but the society's mistreatment and his creator's abandonment as he become a monster or evil.
Monster's action depended upon the society's mistreatment as he become a monster.
Victor Frankenstein's monster is a complex character.
His actions can be seen as a result of both his creator's abandonment and society's mistreatment, rather than inherent evil.
The novel "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley raises questions about the influence of nurture versus nature on a person's behavior, suggesting that the creature's actions were shaped by his experiences and treatment.
QUESTION:-
5) Should there be limits on scientific exploration? If so, what should those limits be?
ANSWER:-
In Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the story raises important ethical questions about the limits of scientific exploration.
The character Victor Frankenstein's reckless pursuit of knowledge without ethical consideration leads to tragic consequences.
Ethical and Moral Limits:
Scientific exploration should be conducted within a framework of ethical and moral principles.
Researchers should consider the potential consequences of their experiments on individuals and society, as Victor Frankenstein failed to do.
This highlights the need for responsible scientific conduct and ethical boundaries in research.
Public Awareness:
Public awareness and engagement in discussions about the ethical boundaries of scientific exploration are essential.
Informed public discourse can help shape policies and limits.
While the novel doesn't provide a specific set of limits, it underscores the importance of considering the potential consequences of scientific discoveries, the well-being of society, and the ethical treatment of life.
In modern discussions, ethical considerations, safety protocols, and the potential for harm often guide decisions on scientific research and experimentation.
Ultimately, the question of limits in scientific exploration is a complex and ongoing ethical debate, with decisions shaped by societal values, potential risks, and the pursuit of knowledge for the greater good.
In sup up:-
At the end of the novel,
The monster, filled with remorse, expresses his regret for his actions and disappears into the Arctic to die as well.
The novel ends with a sense of tragedy and the consequences of unchecked scientific ambition.
Thank you for visiting....🙂🦋
Happy learning 🌷🍀
Reference or work cited:-
https://chat.openai.com/auth/loginclick here
No comments:
Post a Comment